Make

Visual no-code automation with 3,000+ app integrations

n8n

Self-hosted automation platform with full code support

Make vs n8n (2026): Which Is Better?

Make provides a comprehensive no-code automation platform with 3,000+ integrations designed for business users, while n8n offers a developer-focused platform with self-hosting capabilities and full code support. Make emphasizes visual workflow building for non-technical users, whereas n8n combines visual workflows with the ability to write custom code when needed.

Visit Make →Visit n8n →

Decision Shortcut

If you want extensive app integrations → Make

If you want self-hosting control → n8n

If you want code-in-workflows flexibility → n8n

Find Your Fit

Audience

Best fit

Make's visual no-code workflow builder requires no technical expertise compared to n8n's code-when-needed approach.

Make's extensive integration ecosystem and visual interface better serves personal automation projects without technical complexity.

Make's 3,000+ integrations and marketing-focused features better support freelancer workflows and client automation needs.

Make's visual no-code approach has a lower learning curve for students compared to n8n's technical requirements.

Make's extensive integrations and business operations focus better serve small business automation needs without technical overhead.

Make specifically targets marketing operations teams with relevant integrations and growth operations capabilities.

n8n's full code support, self-hosting options, and technical flexibility better serve experienced developers' automation needs.

n8n's self-hosting capabilities and faircode license provide better data sovereignty and deployment control for enterprise requirements.

Scorecard

4Make

1Both

0n8n

Make dominates in integration breadth and user accessibility, making it ideal for business teams seeking comprehensive no-code automation. n8n leads in technical flexibility and deployment control, serving developers and enterprises requiring code customization and self-hosting capabilities.

Dimension

Winner

Both tools offer free plans, though Make provides a permanent free tier while n8n offers a free trial.

Make provides 3,000+ integrations and comprehensive AI toolkit compared to n8n's 500+ integrations.

Make offers more integrations and business-focused features at $10.59/mo compared to n8n's $24/mo starting price.

Make wins 6 of 8 audience types vs n8n's 2, with 0 ties.

Make provides real-time execution monitoring and visual workflows better suited for team collaboration and business operations.

Full Comparison

At a Glance

Make

Automation

n8n

Automation

Starting price

$10.59/mo

$24/mo

Free tier

Free Plan

Free Trial

Pricing model

Freemium

Free Trial

Best for

Marketing operations teams, Customer success managers, No-code automation agencies, Growth operations specialists

Technical teams, developers, and IT/DevOps practitioners who need to automate complex multi-step workflows, build and deploy AI agents with LLM integrations, and require the flexibility to self-host or embed automation into their own products.

Platforms

Web, API, Slack

Web, API, Self-hosted

Pricing

Make

5 plans

n8n

4 plans

Free

Core

$10.59/month, billed monthly

Pro

$18.82/month, billed monthly

Teams

$34.12/month, billed monthly

Enterprise

Free

Starter

$24/mo, billed monthly ($20/mo billed annually)

Pro

$60/mo, billed monthly ($50/mo billed annually)

Business

$960/mo, billed monthly ($800/mo billed annually)

Enterprise

Free

Pricing verified recently. Always confirm on the vendor's site.

Key Differences

- Make offers 3,000+ app integrations vs n8n's 500+ integrations

- n8n provides self-hosting options with faircode license while Make is cloud-based

- n8n supports full JavaScript and Python code within workflows while Make is primarily no-code

- Make targets marketing and business operations teams while n8n focuses on technical teams and developers

- n8n requires technical setup for self-hosting while Make is ready-to-use

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Make if…

- Marketing operations teams needing extensive third-party app integrations

- Customer success managers automating client workflows

- No-code automation agencies building solutions for clients

- Growth operations specialists requiring visual workflow builders

Choose n8n if…

- Technical teams requiring self-hosted automation solutions

- Developers needing to embed custom code in workflows

- IT/DevOps practitioners building complex multi-step automations

- Organizations requiring data sovereignty through self-hosting

Features

Make

- Visual No-Code Workflow Builder

- 3,000+ App Integrations

- Make AI Agents

n8n

- Visual Workflow Builder

- Code-When-You-Need-It (JS & Python)

- 500+ Pre-Built Integrations & HTTP Request Node

Pros & Cons

Make — Pros

- Extensive Integration Ecosystem Available

- Visual No-Code Workflow Builder

- Comprehensive AI Integration Capabilities

Make — Cons

- Significant Feature Complexity for Beginners

- Restrictive Free Tier Limitations

- Technical Expertise Required for Advanced Features

n8n — Pros

- Self-hosting with a faircode license

- 500+ pre-built integrations plus an HTTP fallback

- Full code support inside the visual canvas

n8n — Cons

- Cloud entry tier is tightly capped

- Dedicated support is Enterprise-only

- Self-hosting requires technical setup and maintenance

Final Verdict

Make excels as a comprehensive no-code automation platform with extensive integrations for business users, while n8n serves technical teams requiring code flexibility and self-hosting control. Make suits organizations prioritizing ease of use and broad connectivity, whereas n8n fits teams needing technical customization and deployment flexibility.

Visit Make →Visit n8n →

AISH may earn a commission from affiliate links on this page. This never influences our analysis. All tool data is sourced directly from vendor websites.