Make
Visual no-code automation with 3,000+ app integrations
n8n
Self-hosted automation platform with full code support
Make vs n8n (2026): Which Is Better?
Make provides a comprehensive no-code automation platform with 3,000+ integrations designed for business users, while n8n offers a developer-focused platform with self-hosting capabilities and full code support. Make emphasizes visual workflow building for non-technical users, whereas n8n combines visual workflows with the ability to write custom code when needed.
Decision Shortcut
Find Your Fit
Scorecard
Make dominates in integration breadth and user accessibility, making it ideal for business teams seeking comprehensive no-code automation. n8n leads in technical flexibility and deployment control, serving developers and enterprises requiring code customization and self-hosting capabilities.
Entry Accessibility
Both tools offer free plans, though Make provides a permanent free tier while n8n offers a free trial.
Feature Depth
Make provides 3,000+ integrations and comprehensive AI toolkit compared to n8n's 500+ integrations.
Value for Audience
Make offers more integrations and business-focused features at $10.59/mo compared to n8n's $24/mo starting price.
Audience Breadth
Make wins 6 of 8 audience types vs n8n's 2, with 0 ties.
Team Fit
Make provides real-time execution monitoring and visual workflows better suited for team collaboration and business operations.
At a Glance
| Feature | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $10.59/mo | $24/mo |
| Free Tier | Free Plan | Free Trial |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free Trial |
| Best For | Marketing operations teams, Customer success managers, No-code automation agencies, Growth operations specialists | Technical teams, developers, and IT/DevOps practitioners who need to automate complex multi-step workflows, build and deploy AI agents with LLM integrations, and require the flexibility to self-host or embed automation into their own products. |
| Platforms | Web, API, Slack | Web, API, Self-hosted |
| Category | Automation | Automation |
Pricing
Make
n8n
Pricing verified recently. Always confirm on the vendor's site.
Key Differences
- Make offers 3,000+ app integrations vs n8n's 500+ integrations
- n8n provides self-hosting options with faircode license while Make is cloud-based
- n8n supports full JavaScript and Python code within workflows while Make is primarily no-code
- Make targets marketing and business operations teams while n8n focuses on technical teams and developers
- n8n requires technical setup for self-hosting while Make is ready-to-use
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Make if…
- Marketing operations teams needing extensive third-party app integrations
- Customer success managers automating client workflows
- No-code automation agencies building solutions for clients
- Growth operations specialists requiring visual workflow builders
Choose n8n if…
- Technical teams requiring self-hosted automation solutions
- Developers needing to embed custom code in workflows
- IT/DevOps practitioners building complex multi-step automations
- Organizations requiring data sovereignty through self-hosting
Features
Make
- Visual No-Code Workflow Builder
- 3,000+ App Integrations
- Make AI Agents
n8n
- Visual Workflow Builder
- Code-When-You-Need-It (JS & Python)
- 500+ Pre-Built Integrations & HTTP Request Node
Pros & Cons
Make — Pros
- Extensive Integration Ecosystem Available
- Visual No-Code Workflow Builder
- Comprehensive AI Integration Capabilities
Make — Cons
- Significant Feature Complexity for Beginners
- Restrictive Free Tier Limitations
- Technical Expertise Required for Advanced Features
n8n — Pros
- Self-hosting with a faircode license
- 500+ pre-built integrations plus an HTTP fallback
- Full code support inside the visual canvas
n8n — Cons
- Cloud entry tier is tightly capped
- Dedicated support is Enterprise-only
- Self-hosting requires technical setup and maintenance
Final Verdict
Make excels as a comprehensive no-code automation platform with extensive integrations for business users, while n8n serves technical teams requiring code flexibility and self-hosting control. Make suits organizations prioritizing ease of use and broad connectivity, whereas n8n fits teams needing technical customization and deployment flexibility.
AISH may earn a commission from affiliate links on this page. This never influences our analysis. All tool data is sourced directly from vendor websites.